Hi Suren
On 12/5/24 22:48, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 7:20 PM Hao Ge <hao.ge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Suren
On 12/5/24 10:14, Hao Ge wrote:
Hi Suren
On 12/5/24 03:33, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 7:08 AM Hao Ge <hao.ge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Suren
Thank you for your review.
On 12/4/24 22:39, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 12:35 AM Hao Ge <hao.ge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Hao Ge <gehao@xxxxxxxxxx>
After merge commit 233e89322cbe ("alloc_tag:
fix module allocation tags populated area calculation"),
We still encountered a KASAN bug.
This is because we have only actually performed
page allocation and address mapping here.
we need to unpoisoned portions of underlying memory.
Because we have a change in the size here,we need to
re-annotate poisoned and unpoisoned portions of underlying memory
according to the new size.
Here is the log for KASAN:
[ 5.041171][ T1]
==================================================================
[ 5.042047][ T1] BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in
move_module+0x2c0/0x708
[ 5.042723][ T1] Write of size 240 at addr ffff80007e510000
by task systemd/1
[ 5.043412][ T1]
[ 5.043523][ T72] input: QEMU QEMU USB Tablet as
/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.1/0000:02:001
[ 5.043614][ T1] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not
tainted 6.13.0-rc1+ #28
[ 5.045560][ T1] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine,
BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
[ 5.046328][ T1] Call trace:
[ 5.046670][ T1] show_stack+0x20/0x38 (C)
[ 5.047127][ T1] dump_stack_lvl+0x80/0xf8
[ 5.047533][ T1]
print_address_description.constprop.0+0x58/0x358
[ 5.048092][ T72] hid-generic 0003:0627:0001.0001:
input,hidraw0: USB HID v0.01 Mouse [QEMU 0
[ 5.048126][ T1] print_report+0xb0/0x280
[ 5.049682][ T1] kasan_report+0xb8/0x108
[ 5.050170][ T1] kasan_check_range+0xe8/0x190
[ 5.050685][ T1] memcpy+0x58/0xa0
[ 5.051135][ T1] move_module+0x2c0/0x708
[ 5.051586][ T1] layout_and_allocate.constprop.0+0x308/0x5b8
[ 5.052219][ T1] load_module+0x134/0x16c8
[ 5.052671][ T1] init_module_from_file+0xdc/0x138
[ 5.053193][ T1] idempotent_init_module+0x344/0x600
[ 5.053742][ T1] __arm64_sys_finit_module+0xbc/0x150
[ 5.054289][ T1] invoke_syscall+0xd4/0x258
[ 5.054749][ T1] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0x240
[ 5.055319][ T1] do_el0_svc+0x48/0x68
[ 5.055743][ T1] el0_svc+0x40/0xe0
[ 5.056142][ T1] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x10c/0x138
[ 5.056658][ T1] el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0
Fixes: 233e89322cbe ("alloc_tag: fix module allocation tags
populated area calculation")
Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for the fix!
---
v2: Add comments to kasan_unpoison_vmalloc like other places.
commit 233e89322cbe ("alloc_tag: fix module allocation
tags populated area calculation") is currently in the
mm-hotfixes-unstable branch, so this patch is
developed based on the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch.
---
lib/alloc_tag.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/alloc_tag.c b/lib/alloc_tag.c
index 4ee6caa6d2da..f885b3f3af0e 100644
--- a/lib/alloc_tag.c
+++ b/lib/alloc_tag.c
@@ -421,7 +421,20 @@ static int vm_module_tags_populate(void)
__free_page(next_page[i]);
return -ENOMEM;
}
+
+ kasan_poison_vmalloc((void *)module_tags.start_addr,
+ vm_module_tags->nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
+
vm_module_tags->nr_pages += nr;
+
+ /*
+ * Mark the pages as accessible, now that they are
mapped.
+ * With hardware tag-based KASAN, marking is
skipped for
+ * non-VM_ALLOC mappings, see
__kasan_unpoison_vmalloc().
+ */
+ kasan_unpoison_vmalloc((void
*)module_tags.start_addr,
+ vm_module_tags->nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ KASAN_VMALLOC_PROT_NORMAL);
Instead of poisoning [module_tags.start_addr,
vm_module_tags->nr_pages], incrementing vm_module_tags->nr_pages and
the unpoisoning [module_tags.start_addr, vm_module_tags->nr_pages]
could we simply poisons the additional area like this:
kasan_unpoison_vmalloc((void
*)module_tags.start_addr +
(vm_module_tags->nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT),
nr << PAGE_SHIFT,
KASAN_VMALLOC_PROT_NORMAL);
vm_module_tags->nr_pages += nr;
?
I had considered making such modifications earlier.
But considering the following situation,
A module tags spans across the regions of [module_tags.start_addr,
vm_module_tags->nr_pages] and [module_tags.start_addr +
vm_module_tags->nr_pages, ...].
It may result in false positives for out-of-bounds errors.
Sorry, maybe I'm missing something but I don't see why poisoning only
newly mapped area would lead to false positives. Could you please
clarify?
Because KASAN may perceive the two as distinct address spaces, despite
their addresses being contiguous.
So, when a module tag spans across these two contiguous address
spaces, KASAN may incorrectly consider it as an out-of-bounds access.
Also, if you do need to unpoison and then poison, using phys_end and
new_end would be better, like this:
kasan_poison_vmalloc((void *)module_tags.start_addr,
phys_end -
module_tags.start_addr)
kasan_unpoison_vmalloc((void *)module_tags.start_addr,
new_end -
module_tags.start_addr,
KASAN_VMALLOC_PROT_NORMAL);
OK, the next version will include.
After verification and consideration, I have found that this
modification may still pose problems.
Because we haven't ensured that new_end is page-aligned,
So, we've only made the region from||module_tags.start_addr
tonew_endaccessible.
Correct and the area [module_tags.start_addr, new_end] is the one that
should be considered valid/accessible. We fault-in a physical page
that includes new_end and might cover some area after that address but
accessing the addresses above new_end is technically out-of-bounds
(there are no valid codetags there).
Using this example, in reality,end equals 0xffff80007e5100f0:
Write of size 240 at addr ffff80007e510000 by task systemd/1
When we access other memory within the same page as0xffff80007e5100f0,
KASAN warnings will also be issued due to the lack of unpoisoned
portions in that memory.
Will you get a KASAN warning if you access memory below new_end?
Warnings above that address I think should be considered as expected
(even though we have a valid physical page there).
Does that make sense?
Is that really the case?
Here is the log that has been updated to include the calculation new_end
- module_tags.start_addr.
On my machine,module_tags.start_addr is equal to ffff80007e510000
and the size of the first module_tags is 240
So, because you only made the range|[module_tags.start_addr,
new_end]|accessible, the same issue will arise again later on.
[ 5.798918][ T258] BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in
move_module+0x2c0/0x708
[ 5.799622][ T258] Write of size 200 at addr ffff80007e5100f0 by
task systemd-modules/258
[ 5.800149][ T256] systemd-journald[256]: Collecting audit messages
is disabled.
[ 5.800296][ T258]
[ 5.800301][ T258] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 258 Comm: systemd-modules Not
tainted 6.13.0-rc1+ #46
[ 5.801727][ T10] input: QEMU QEMU USB Mouse as
/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.1/0000:02:00.3
[ 5.801905][ T258] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS
0.0.0 02/06/2015
[ 5.801911][ T258] Call trace:
[ 5.804120][ T258] show_stack+0x20/0x38 (C)
[ 5.804512][ T258] dump_stack_lvl+0x80/0xf8
[ 5.804916][ T258] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x58/0x358
[ 5.805276][ T10] hid-generic 0003:0627:0001.0003: input,hidraw2:
USB HID v0.01 Mouse [QEMU 0
[ 5.805501][ T258] print_report+0xb0/0x280
[ 5.807031][ T258] kasan_report+0xb8/0x108
[ 5.807415][ T258] kasan_check_range+0xe8/0x190
[ 5.807714][ T124] pcieport 0000:00:02.3: pciehp: Slot(0-11): No
device found
[ 5.807921][ T258] memcpy+0x58/0xa0
[ 5.807927][ T258] move_module+0x2c0/0x708
[ 5.809346][ T258] layout_and_allocate.constprop.0+0x308/0x5b8
[ 5.809942][ T258] load_module+0x134/0x16c8
[ 5.810375][ T258] init_module_from_file+0xdc/0x138
[ 5.810870][ T258] idempotent_init_module+0x344/0x600
[ 5.811389][ T258] __arm64_sys_finit_module+0xbc/0x150
[ 5.811916][ T258] invoke_syscall+0xd4/0x258
[ 5.812362][ T258] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0x240
[ 5.812914][ T258] do_el0_svc+0x48/0x68
[ 5.813318][ T258] el0_svc+0x40/0xe0
[ 5.813698][ T258] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x10c/0x138
[ 5.814210][ T258] el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0[ 5.798918][ T258]
BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in move_module+0x2c0/0x708
[ 5.799622][ T258] Write of size 200 at addr ffff80007e5100f0 by
task systemd-modules/258
[ 5.800149][ T256] systemd-journald[256]: Collecting audit messages
is disabled.
[ 5.800296][ T258]
[ 5.800301][ T258] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 258 Comm: systemd-modules Not
tainted 6.13.0-rc1+ #46
[ 5.801727][ T10] input: QEMU QEMU USB Mouse as
/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.1/0000:02:00.3
[ 5.801905][ T258] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS
0.0.0 02/06/2015
[ 5.801911][ T258] Call trace:
[ 5.804120][ T258] show_stack+0x20/0x38 (C)
[ 5.804512][ T258] dump_stack_lvl+0x80/0xf8
[ 5.804916][ T258] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x58/0x358
[ 5.805276][ T10] hid-generic 0003:0627:0001.0003: input,hidraw2:
USB HID v0.01 Mouse [QEMU 0
[ 5.805501][ T258] print_report+0xb0/0x280
[ 5.807031][ T258] kasan_report+0xb8/0x108
[ 5.807415][ T258] kasan_check_range+0xe8/0x190
[ 5.807714][ T124] pcieport 0000:00:02.3: pciehp: Slot(0-11): No
device found
[ 5.807921][ T258] memcpy+0x58/0xa0
[ 5.807927][ T258] move_module+0x2c0/0x708
[ 5.809346][ T258] layout_and_allocate.constprop.0+0x308/0x5b8
[ 5.809942][ T258] load_module+0x134/0x16c8
[ 5.810375][ T258] init_module_from_file+0xdc/0x138
[ 5.810870][ T258] idempotent_init_module+0x344/0x600
[ 5.811389][ T258] __arm64_sys_finit_module+0xbc/0x150
[ 5.811916][ T258] invoke_syscall+0xd4/0x258
[ 5.812362][ T258] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0x240
[ 5.812914][ T258] do_el0_svc+0x48/0x68
[ 5.813318][ T258] el0_svc+0x40/0xe0
[ 5.813698][ T258] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x10c/0x138
[ 5.814210][ T258] el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0
Based on that, I would suggest sticking with the V2 version.
Thanks
Best Regards
Hao
Thanks
Best regards
Hao
}
return 0;
--
2.25.1
