On 09/06/2012 04:18 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hello Lai, > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 04:14:51PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> On 09/06/2012 10:53 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: >>> Normally, MIGRATE_ISOLATE type is used for memory-hotplug. >>> But it's irony type because the pages isolated would exist >>> as free page in free_area->free_list[MIGRATE_ISOLATE] so people >>> can think of it as allocatable pages but it is *never* allocatable. >>> It ends up confusing NR_FREE_PAGES vmstat so it would be >>> totally not accurate so some of place which depend on such vmstat >>> could reach wrong decision by the context. >>> >>> There were already report about it.[1] >>> [1] 702d1a6e, memory-hotplug: fix kswapd looping forever problem >>> >>> Then, there was other report which is other problem.[2] >>> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg41251.html >>> >>> I believe it can make problems in future, too. >>> So I hope removing such irony type by another design. >>> >>> I hope this patch solves it and let's revert [1] and doesn't need [2]. >>> >>> * Changelog v1 >>> * Fix from Michal's many suggestion >>> >>> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >>> @@ -180,30 +287,35 @@ int undo_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn, >>> * all pages in [start_pfn...end_pfn) must be in the same zone. >>> * zone->lock must be held before call this. >>> * >>> - * Returns 1 if all pages in the range are isolated. >>> + * Returns true if all pages in the range are isolated. >>> */ >>> -static int >>> -__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) >>> +static bool >>> +__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) >>> { >>> + unsigned long pfn, next_pfn; >>> struct page *page; >>> >>> - while (pfn < end_pfn) { >>> - if (!pfn_valid_within(pfn)) { >>> - pfn++; >>> - continue; >>> - } >>> - page = pfn_to_page(pfn); >>> - if (PageBuddy(page)) >>> - pfn += 1 << page_order(page); >>> - else if (page_count(page) == 0 && >>> - page_private(page) == MIGRATE_ISOLATE) >>> - pfn += 1; >>> - else >>> - break; >>> + list_for_each_entry(page, &isolated_pages, lru) { >> >>> + if (&page->lru == &isolated_pages) >>> + return false; >> >> what's the mean of this line? > > I just copied it from Michal's code but It seem to be not needed. > I will remove it in next spin. > >> >>> + pfn = page_to_pfn(page); >>> + if (pfn >= end_pfn) >>> + return false; >>> + if (pfn >= start_pfn) >>> + goto found; this test is wrong. if ((pfn <= start_pfn) && (start_pfn < pfn + (1UL << page_order(page)))) goto found; >>> + } >>> + return false; >>> + >>> + list_for_each_entry_continue(page, &isolated_pages, lru) { >>> + if (page_to_pfn(page) != next_pfn) >>> + return false; >> >> where is next_pfn init-ed? > > by "goto found" don't goto inner label. move the found label up: + +found: + next_pfn = page_to_pfn(page); + list_for_each_entry_from(page, &isolated_pages, lru) { + if (page_to_pfn(page) != next_pfn) + return false; + pfn = page_to_pfn(page); + next_pfn = pfn + (1UL << page_order(page)); + if (next_pfn >= end_pfn) + return true; } -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>