Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: optionally pre-zero hugetlb pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/12/2024 21:58, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 08:20:58PM +0000, Frank van der Linden wrote:
>> Fresh hugetlb pages are zeroed out when they are faulted in,
>> just like with all other page types. This can take up a good
>> amount of time for larger page sizes (e.g. around 40
>> milliseconds for a 1G page on a recent AMD-based system).
>>
>> This normally isn't a problem, since hugetlb pages are typically
>> mapped by the application for a long time, and the initial
>> delay when touching them isn't much of an issue.
>>
>> However, there are some use cases where a large number of hugetlb
>> pages are touched when an application (such as a VM backed by these
>> pages) starts. For 256 1G pages and 40ms per page, this would take
>> 10 seconds, a noticeable delay.
> 
> The current huge page zeroing code is not that great to begin with.
> 
> There was a patchset posted some time ago to remedy at least some of it:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230830184958.2333078-1-ankur.a.arora@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> but it apparently fell through the cracks.
> 

It didn't fell through the cracks for sure

Just had a detour into preempt=auto before resuming the main work. But that
seems to be done in the last merge window with the lazy preempt stuff. I think
Ankur was planning on following that series above soon-ish.

Adding him here, such that he keeps me honest :)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux