Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: introduce mmap_lock_speculate_{try_begin|retry}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:53:57 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 08:18:38AM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> 
> > > >+static inline bool mmap_lock_speculate_retry(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int seq)
> > > >+{
> > > >+      return do_read_seqcount_retry(&mm->mm_lock_seq, seq);
> > >
> > > Just curious why we don't use read_seqcount_retry().
> > >
> > > Looks this is the only user outside seqlock.h.
> > 
> > Ah, good eye! read_seqcount_retry() would be better.
> > 
> > Peter, do you want me to post a new patchset or you can patch it when
> > picking it up?
> 
> Fixed up my local copy, thanks!

I take this to mean that you'll be merging these.  I don't see this
series in -next and I'm sitting on the v1 series, which I shall now
drop.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux