On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 01:37:41PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 09:55:07AM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > Since Linux 6.13 it has become possible to use all madvise flags when targeting > > the calling process. Update the man page to reflect this change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > man/man2/process_madvise.2 | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/man/man2/process_madvise.2 b/man/man2/process_madvise.2 > > index b78a61553..d12407bdb 100644 > > --- a/man/man2/process_madvise.2 > > +++ b/man/man2/process_madvise.2 > > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ This value must be less than or equal to > > or accessible via the call > > .IR sysconf(_SC_IOV_MAX) ). > > .P > > -The > > +If manipulating another process, or prior to Linux 6.13, the > > For consistency with other pages, how s/prior to/before/? Prior to is > ok; it's just for being able to grep for a single expression. Ah, I think I saw a 'prior to' somewhere but actually no, that was the 'starting in' below, my mistake. Will fix up! > > > .I advice > > argument is one of the following values: > > .TP > > @@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ See > > See > > .BR madvise (2). > > .P > > +Starting in Linux 6.13, when manipulating the calling process, any advice flag > > +is permitted. > > Please use semantic newlines. See man-pages(7), and the other email. Ack, will do! > > Cheers, > Alex > > > +.P > > The > > .I flags > > argument is reserved for future use; currently, this argument must be > > -- > > 2.47.1 > > -- > <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> Will respin and send a v2 shortly. Thanks!