Re: [PATCH man-pages] process_madvise.2: describe 6.13 behaviour permitting all madvise flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 01:14:08PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 29.11.24 10:55, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > Since Linux 6.13 it has become possible to use all madvise flags when targeting
> > the calling process. Update the man page to reflect this change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   man/man2/process_madvise.2 | 5 ++++-
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/man/man2/process_madvise.2 b/man/man2/process_madvise.2
> > index b78a61553..d12407bdb 100644
> > --- a/man/man2/process_madvise.2
> > +++ b/man/man2/process_madvise.2
> > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ This value must be less than or equal to
> >   or accessible via the call
> >   .IR sysconf(_SC_IOV_MAX) ).
> >   .P
> > -The
> > +If manipulating another process, or prior to Linux 6.13, the
> >   .I advice
> >   argument is one of the following values:
> >   .TP
> > @@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ See
> >   See
> >   .BR madvise (2).
> >   .P
> > +Starting in Linux 6.13, when manipulating the calling process, any advice flag
> > +is permitted.
> > +.P
> >   The
> >   .I flags
> >   argument is reserved for future use; currently, this argument must be
>
> I was briefly concerned when reading the subject, then I realized here
> "calling process" :)

Haha yes, I did wonder how that would sound when I wrote it, but sort of
ran out of space in the subject and hoped the commit message would reduce
panic :P

>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux