On 09/05/2012 01:45 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:31:56PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: >>> > > I simply don't want to have to do two (or more) hierarchy walks for >>> > > accounting on every schedule event, all that pointer chasing is stupidly >>> > > expensive. >> > >> > You wouldn't have to do more than one hierarchy walks for that. What >> > Tejun seems to want, is the ability to not have a particular controller >> > at some point in the tree. But if they exist, they are always together. > Nope, as I wrote in the other reply, Would you mind, then, stopping for a moment and telling us what it is, then, that you envision? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>