Re: [PATCH 0/7] spanning write related cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 08:31:13AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [241126 20:28]:
>> Here is some cleanup related to spanning write.
>
>None of these fix anything, but do fiddle with code that's pretty
>critical to the kernel.  Most of the changes will be immeasurable in
>change but carry risk to causing subtle changes.
>
>Some are simple removal of returns that aren't used while others change
>things because you think they are probably the equivalent.  This seems
>like unnecessary chrun at this point.  I'm all for efficient code but
>this is getting a bit much, some of these are just preference of what to
>use that will already exist in the cpu cache.
>
>I'll get back to you when I dig through them, as some need a deeper look
>for sure.

Thanks

>
>Liam
>
>> 
>> Wei Yang (7):
>>   maple_tree: not necessary to check ahead if !content
>>   maple_tree: validate we won't split on NULL
>>   maple_tree: check mid_split only may have
>>   maple_tree: the return value of mast_spanning_rebalance() is not used
>>   maple_tree: the type of left subtree is already saved in bnode->type
>>   maple_tree: always need to update max of new left node
>>   maple_tree: only ascend left subtree to get the old node for
>>     replacement
>> 
>>  lib/maple_tree.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>> 
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>> 

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux