> On 2024/11/21 12:55, Tomohiro Misono wrote:
> > commit 44b8f8bf2438 ("mm: memory-failure: add memory failure stats
>
> Sorry for late, I've been swamped recently.
Hi,
Thanks for your comments.
>
> > to sysfs") introduces per NUMA memory error stats which show
> > breakdown of HardwareCorrupted of /proc/meminfo in
> > /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/memory_failure.
>
> Thanks for your patch.
>
> >
> > However, HardwareCorrupted also counts soft-offline pages. So, add
> > soft-offline stats in mf_stats too to represent more accurate status.
>
> Adding soft-offline stats makes sense to me.
Thanks for confirming.
>
> >
> > This updates total count as:
> > total = recovered + ignored + failed + delayed + soft_offline>
> > Test example:
> > 1) # grep HardwareCorrupted /proc/meminfo
> > HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
> > 2) soft-offline 1 page by madvise(MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE)
> > 3) # grep HardwareCorrupted /proc/meminfo
> > HardwareCorrupted: 4 kB
> > # grep -r "" /sys/devices/system/node/node0/memory_failure
> > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/memory_failure/total:1
> > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/memory_failure/soft_offline:1
> > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/memory_failure/recovered:0
> > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/memory_failure/ignored:0
> > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/memory_failure/failed:0
> > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/memory_failure/delayed:0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Hello
> >
> > This is RFC because I'm not sure adding SOFT_OFFLINE in enum
> > mf_result is a right approach. Also, maybe is it better to move
> > update_per_node_mf_stats() into num_poisoned_pages_inc()?
> >
> > I omitted some cleanups and sysfs doc update in this version to
> > highlight changes. I'd appreciate any suggestions.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tomohiro Misono
> >
> > include/linux/mm.h | 2 ++
> > include/linux/mmzone.h | 4 +++-
> > mm/memory-failure.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > index 5d6cd523c7c0..7f93f6883760 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -3991,6 +3991,8 @@ enum mf_result {
> > MF_FAILED, /* Error: handling failed */
> > MF_DELAYED, /* Will be handled later */
> > MF_RECOVERED, /* Successfully recovered */
> > +
> > + MF_RES_SOFT_OFFLINE, /* Soft-offline */
>
> It might not be a good idea to add MF_RES_SOFT_OFFLINE here. 'mf_result' is used to record
> the result of memory failure handler. So it might be inappropriate to add MF_RES_SOFT_OFFLINE here.
Understood. As I don't see other suitable place to put ENUM value, how about changing like below?
Or, do you prefer adding another ENUM type instead of this?
```
static void update_per_node_mf_stats(unsigned long pfn,
- enum mf_result result)
+ enum mf_result result, bool is_soft_offline)
{
int nid = MAX_NUMNODES;
struct memory_failure_stats *mf_stats = NULL;
@@ -1299,6 +1299,12 @@ static void update_per_node_mf_stats(unsigned long pfn,
}
mf_stats = &NODE_DATA(nid)->mf_stats;
+ if (is_soft_offline) {
+ ++mf->stats->soft_offlined;
+ ++mf_stats->total;
+ return;
+ }
+
switch (result) {
case MF_IGNORED:
++mf_stats->ignored;
```
Regards,
Tomohiro Misono
>
>
> Thanks.
> .
