On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:12:34PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > > No, I never counted out differing granularity. > > Can you elaborate on which interface do you envision to make it work? > They will clearly be mounted in the same hierarchy, or as said > alternatively, comounted. I'm not sure yet. At the simplest, mask of controllers which should honor (or ignore) nesting beyond the node. That should be understandable enough. Not sure whether that would be flexible enough yet tho. In the end, they should be comounted but again I don't think enforcing comounting at the moment is a step towards that. It's more like a step sideways. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>