Re: [PATCH] mm: shmem: Fix variable type to int to evaluate negative conditions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



…
> ---
> Coverity Message:
> CID 1601569: (#1 of 1): Unsigned compared against 0 (NO_EFFECT)
…

Can such information become a part of the change description?


Would a summary phrase like “Use signed data type for version handling
in shmem_parse_opt_casefold()” be more appropriate?

Regards,
Markus





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux