Currently in shrink_folio_list(), reclaim for folios under writeback
falls into 3 different cases:
1) Reclaim is encountering an excessive number of folios under
writeback and this folio has both the writeback and reclaim flags
set
2) Dirty throttling is enabled (this happens if reclaim through cgroup
is not enabled, if reclaim through cgroupv2 memcg is enabled, or
if reclaim is on the root cgroup), or if the folio is not marked for
immediate reclaim, or if the caller does not have __GFP_FS (or
__GFP_IO if it's going to swap) set
3) Legacy cgroupv1 encounters a folio that already has the reclaim flag
set and the caller did not have __GFP_FS (or __GFP_IO if swap) set
In cases 1) and 2), we activate the folio and skip reclaiming it while
in case 3), we wait for writeback to finish on the folio and then try
to reclaim the folio again. In case 3, we wait on writeback because
cgroupv1 does not have dirty folio throttling, as such this is a
mitigation against the case where there are too many folios in writeback
with nothing else to reclaim.
For filesystems where writeback may take an indeterminate amount of time
to write to disk, this has the possibility of stalling reclaim.
In this commit, if legacy memcg encounters a folio with the reclaim flag
set (eg case 3) and the folio belongs to a mapping that has the
AS_WRITEBACK_INDETERMINATE flag set, the folio will be activated and skip
reclaim (eg default to behavior in case 2) instead.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 749cdc110c74..37ce6b6dac06 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1129,8 +1129,9 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
* 2) Global or new memcg reclaim encounters a folio that is
* not marked for immediate reclaim, or the caller does not
* have __GFP_FS (or __GFP_IO if it's simply going to swap,
- * not to fs). In this case mark the folio for immediate
- * reclaim and continue scanning.
+ * not to fs), or the writeback may take an indeterminate
+ * amount of time to complete. In this case mark the folio
+ * for immediate reclaim and continue scanning.
*
* Require may_enter_fs() because we would wait on fs, which
* may not have submitted I/O yet. And the loop driver might
@@ -1155,6 +1156,8 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
* takes to write them to disk.
*/
if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
+ mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
+
/* Case 1 above */
if (current_is_kswapd() &&
folio_test_reclaim(folio) &&
@@ -1165,7 +1168,8 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
/* Case 2 above */
} else if (writeback_throttling_sane(sc) ||
!folio_test_reclaim(folio) ||
- !may_enter_fs(folio, sc->gfp_mask)) {
+ !may_enter_fs(folio, sc->gfp_mask) ||
+ (mapping && mapping_writeback_indeterminate(mapping))) {
/*
* This is slightly racy -
* folio_end_writeback() might have
--
2.43.5
