* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [241121 02:13]:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 09:12:31AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> >* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [241118 21:10]:
> >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:49:55PM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> >> >* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [241115 20:48]:
> >> >> Empty tree and single entry tree is handled else whether, so the maple
> >> >> tree here must be a tree with nodes.
> >> >>
> >> >> If the height is 1 and we found the gap, it will jump to *done* since it
> >> >> is also a leaf.
> >> >> If the height is more than one, and there may be an available range, we
> >> >> will descend the tree, which is not root anymore.
> >> >>
> >> >> If there is no available range, we will set error and return.
> >> >
> >> >Isn't this needed for the overflow case? That is, if there is a range
> >> >that ends at ULONG_MAX, then we will break from the loop on the offset
> >> >limit, but not check for root, return false, and continue to loop.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I may not follow you correctly.
> >>
> >> If there is an available range that ends at ULONG_MAX for a root node, we
> >> break the loop with two conditions:
> >>
> >> * the root node is a leaf node, then we will set found to true
> >> * the root node has children, then descend to a non-root node
> >>
> >> Not sure this is the case you mentioned.
> >
> >I am concerned of the case where there isn't a gap in the last slot of a
> >leaf root node. Examining it, I think we are okay.
> >
> >next_slot:
> > min = pivot + 1; <-----min = 0, overflow.
>
> Oh, this overflow.
>
> > if (mas->last <= pivot) { <-- still okay.
> > mas_set_err(mas, -EBUSY);
> > return true;
> > }
>
> Thanks.
>
> So it looks good to you ?
Yes,
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
