On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would suggest to do the strict fix as above in as patch 1/8 and push > it in -mm, and to do only the optimization removal in 3/8. I think > we want it in -stable too later, so it'll make life easier to > cherry-pick the commit if it's merged independently. All right. So I did this and the strict fix got into Andrew's tree as mm-fix-potential-anon_vma-locking-issue-in-mprotect.patch Andrew: when you try applying this series, this patch (2/7) won't apply due to the strict fix being already there. Please just skip it (and replace patch 4/7 with the replacement I'm about to send, so that we end up with the same end state) -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>