On 2024-11-20 10:26:02 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > The "%pK" dereferences a pointer and there's some SELinux hooks attached to > that code. The problem is that the SELinux hooks take spinlocks. This would > not have been an issue if it wasn't for that "%pK" in the format. That is missing check and I think Thomas Weissschuh wanted to add it. So we don't call into selinux. Sebastian
