On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 00:43, SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:59:40 +0800 winterver <295107659@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Jiale Yang <295107659@xxxxxx>
> >
> > Remove 'return;' at the end of void cma_activate_area(). It's a void
> > function, so an ending return statement is unnecessary.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiale Yang <295107659@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/cma.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
> > index 2d9fae939..070399bce 100644
> > --- a/mm/cma.c
> > +++ b/mm/cma.c
> > @@ -135,7 +135,6 @@ static void __init cma_activate_area(struct cma *cma)
> > totalcma_pages -= cma->count;
> > cma->count = 0;
> > pr_err("CMA area %s could not be activated\n", cma->name);
> > - return;
> > }
>
> Looks good to me. But, seems a same change[1] from Pintu Kumar has already
> merged into mm-unstable?
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20240927181637.19941-1-quic_pintu@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Yes, this [1] is already part of linux-next now.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20241118&id=1fa00a568d113db279f683f40636cf72cf73a55d
