Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] libfs: Improve behavior when directory offset values wrap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2024-11-17 at 16:32 -0500, cel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The fix in commit 64a7ce76fb90 ("libfs: fix infinite directory reads
> for offset dir") introduced a fence in offset_iterate_dir() to stop
> the loop from returning child entries created after the directory
> was opened. This comparison relies on the strong ordering of
> DIR_OFFSET_MIN <= largest child offset <= next_offset to terminate
> the directory iteration.
> 
> However, because simple_offset_add() uses mtree_alloc_cyclic() to
> select each next new directory offset, ctx->next_offset is not
> always the highest unused offset. Once mtree_alloc_cyclic() allows
> a new offset value to wrap, ctx->next_offset will be set to a value
> less than the actual largest child offset.
> 
> The result is that readdir(3) no longer shows any entries in the
> directory because their offsets are above ctx->next_offset, which is
> now a small value. This situation is persistent, and the directory
> cannot be removed unless all current children are already known and
> can be explicitly removed by name first.
> 
> In the current Maple tree implementation, there is no practical way
> that 63-bit offset values can ever wrap, so this issue is cleverly
> avoided. But the ordering dependency is not documented via comments
> or code, making the mechanism somewhat brittle. And it makes the
> continued use of mtree_alloc_cyclic() somewhat confusing.
> 
> Further, if commit 64a7ce76fb90 ("libfs: fix infinite directory
> reads for offset dir") were to be backported to a kernel that still
> uses xarray to manage simple directory offsets, the directory offset
> value range is limited to 32-bits, which is small enough to allow a
> wrap after a few weeks of constant creation of entries in one
> directory.
> 
> Therefore, replace the use of ctx->next_offset for fencing new
> children from appearing in readdir results.
> 
> A jiffies timestamp marks the end of each opendir epoch. Entries
> created after this timestamp will not be visible to the file
> descriptor. I chose jiffies so that the dentry->d_time field can be
> re-used for storing the entry creation time.
> 
> The new mechanism has its own corner cases. For instance, I think
> if jiffies wraps twice while a directory is open, some children
> might become invisible. On 32-bit systems, the jiffies value wraps
> every 49 days. Double-wrapping is not a risk on systems with 64-bit
> jiffies. Unlike with the next_offset-based mechanism, re-opening the
> directory will make invisible children re-appear.
> 
> Reported-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20241111005242.34654-1-cel@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m1c448e5bd4aae3632a09468affcfe1d1594c6a59
> Fixes: 64a7ce76fb90 ("libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir")
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/libfs.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
> index bf67954b525b..862a603fd454 100644
> --- a/fs/libfs.c
> +++ b/fs/libfs.c
> @@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ int simple_offset_add(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	offset_set(dentry, offset);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(dentry->d_time, jiffies);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -454,9 +455,7 @@ void simple_offset_destroy(struct offset_ctx *octx)
>  
>  static int offset_dir_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
> -	struct offset_ctx *ctx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode);
> -
> -	file->private_data = (void *)ctx->next_offset;
> +	file->private_data = (void *)jiffies;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -473,9 +472,6 @@ static int offset_dir_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>   */
>  static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
>  {
> -	struct inode *inode = file->f_inode;
> -	struct offset_ctx *ctx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode);
> -
>  	switch (whence) {
>  	case SEEK_CUR:
>  		offset += file->f_pos;
> @@ -490,7 +486,8 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
>  
>  	/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */
>  	if (!offset)
> -		file->private_data = (void *)ctx->next_offset;
> +		/* Make newer child entries visible */
> +		file->private_data = (void *)jiffies;
>  	return vfs_setpos(file, offset, LONG_MAX);
>  }
>  
> @@ -521,7 +518,8 @@ static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry)
>  			  inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode));
>  }
>  
> -static void offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx, long last_index)
> +static void offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx,
> +			       unsigned long fence)
>  {
>  	struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode);
>  	struct dentry *dentry;
> @@ -531,14 +529,15 @@ static void offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx, lon
>  		if (!dentry)
>  			return;
>  
> -		if (dentry2offset(dentry) >= last_index) {
> -			dput(dentry);
> -			return;
> -		}
> -
> -		if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) {
> -			dput(dentry);
> -			return;
> +		/*
> +		 * Output only child entries created during or before
> +		 * the current opendir epoch.
> +		 */
> +		if (time_before_eq(dentry->d_time, fence)) {
> +			if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) {
> +				dput(dentry);
> +				return;
> +			}
>  		}
>  
>  		ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry) + 1;
> @@ -569,15 +568,14 @@ static void offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx, lon
>   */
>  static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
>  {
> +	unsigned long fence = (unsigned long)file->private_data;
>  	struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry;
> -	long last_index = (long)file->private_data;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&d_inode(dir)->i_rwsem);
>  
>  	if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx))
>  		return 0;
> -
> -	offset_iterate_dir(d_inode(dir), ctx, last_index);
> +	offset_iterate_dir(d_inode(dir), ctx, fence);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  

Using timestamps instead of directory ordering does seem less brittle,
and the choice to use jiffies makes sense given that d_time is also an
unsigned long.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux