Kees Bakker <kees@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > + wreq->buffer.iter = wreq->buffer.iter; > Is this correct, an assignment to itself? That should just be removed. Both branches of the preceding if-statement set it. David
Kees Bakker <kees@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > + wreq->buffer.iter = wreq->buffer.iter; > Is this correct, an assignment to itself? That should just be removed. Both branches of the preceding if-statement set it. David