On 15.11.24 10:32, Baoquan He wrote:
On 10/25/24 at 05:11pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:Let's use our new mutex instead.Is there reason vmcoredd_mutex need be replaced and integrated with the vmcore_mutex? Is it the reason the concurrent opening of vmcore could happen with the old vmcoredd_mutex?
Yes, see the next patch in this series. But I consider this valuable on its own: there is no need to have two mutexes.
I can make that clearer in the patch description. -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
