Hi Pekka,
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ezequiel,
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This patch changes the __kmalloc_node() logic to return NULL
>> if alloc_pages() fails to return valid pages.
>> This is done to avoid to trace a false positive kmalloc event.
>>
>> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> mm/slob.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c
>> index 45d4ca7..686e98b 100644
>> --- a/mm/slob.c
>> +++ b/mm/slob.c
>> @@ -450,15 +450,16 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node)
>> size, size + align, gfp, node);
>> } else {
>> unsigned int order = get_order(size);
>> + struct page *page;
>>
>> if (likely(order))
>> gfp |= __GFP_COMP;
>> ret = slob_new_pages(gfp, order, node);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - struct page *page;
>> - page = virt_to_page(ret);
>> - page->private = size;
>> - }
>> + if (!ret)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + page = virt_to_page(ret);
>> + page->private = size;
>>
>> trace_kmalloc_node(_RET_IP_, ret,
>> size, PAGE_SIZE << order, gfp, node);
>
> As mentioned earlier, I think it's valuable for the userspace to be
> able to trace allocation failures as well. So I'm not applying this
> patch.
Yes, you're right. I have a few patches for that.
Thanks!
Ezequiel.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>