Hi Hugh,
LGTM.
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Chris
On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 1:11 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Though even more elusive than before, list_del corruption has still been
> seen on THP's deferred split queue.
>
> The idea in commit e66f3185fa04 was right, but its implementation wrong.
> The context omitted an important comment just before the critical test:
> "split_folio() removes folio from list on success." In ignoring that
> comment, when a THP split succeeded, the code went on to release the
> preceding safe folio, preserving instead an irrelevant (formerly head)
> folio: which gives no safety because it's not on the list. Fix the logic.
>
> Fixes: e66f3185fa04 ("mm/thp: fix deferred split queue not partially_mapped")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 03fd4bc39ea1..5734d5d5060f 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3790,7 +3790,9 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
> * in the case it was underused, then consider it used and
> * don't add it back to split_queue.
> */
> - if (!did_split && !folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)) {
> + if (did_split) {
> + ; /* folio already removed from list */
> + } else if (!folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)) {
> list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list);
> removed++;
> } else {
> --
> 2.35.3
