Hello, thanks for the inputs Geert, Johannes, On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 19:27:08 +0900, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Johannes, > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 9:37 AM Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 09:36 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 09:19 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > - depends on ARM || ((M68K || RISCV || SUPERH || XTENSA) && !MMU) > > > > > > > + depends on ARM || ((M68K || RISCV || SUPERH || UML || XTENSA) && !MMU) > > > > > > > > > > > > s/UML/X86/? > > > > > > > > > > I guess the fdpic loader can be used to X86, but this patchset only > > > > > adds UML to be able to select it. I intended to add UML into nommu > > > > > family. > > > > > > > > While currently x86-nommu is supported for UML only, this is really > > > > x86-specific. I still hope UML will get support for other architectures > > > > one day, at which point a dependency on UML here will become wrong... > > > > > > > > > > X86 isn't set for UML, X64_32 and X64_64 are though. > > > > > > Given that the no-MMU UM support even is 64-bit only, that probably > > > should then really be (UML && X86_64). > > > > > > But it already has !MMU, so can't be selected otherwise, and it seems > > > that non-X86 UML > > > > ... would require far more changes in all kinds of places, so not sure > > I'd be too concerned about it here. > > OK, up to you... Indeed, this particular patch [02/13] intends to support the fdpic loader under the condition 1) x86_64 ELF binaries (w/ PIE), 2) on UML, 3) and with) !MMU configured. Given that situation, the strict check should be like: depends on ARM || ((M68K || RISCV || SUPERH || (UML && X86_64) || XTENSA) && !MMU) (as Johannes mentioned). on the other hand, the fdpic loader works (afaik) on MMU environment so, depends on ARM || (UML && X86_64) || ((M68K || RISCV || SUPERH || XTENSA) && !MMU) should also works, but this might be too broad for this patchset (and not sure if this makes a new use case). anyway, thank you for the comment. # I really wanted to have comments from nommu folks. -- Hajime