Re: [PATCH] mm/compaction: fix the total_isolated in strict mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2024/11/3 04:16, Qiang Liu wrote:
If the last cycle reads bogus compound_order() and blockpfn > end_pfn occurs,

if blockpfn > end_pfn occurs, we will reset the blockpfn, right?

	/*
	 * Be careful to not go outside of the pageblock.
	 */
	if (unlikely(blockpfn > end_pfn))
		blockpfn = end_pfn;

So how this can happen?

it is possible that total_isolated will be less than nr_scanned. In this case,
strict mode should return 0, but the “if (strict && blockpfn < end_pfn)”
statement cannot recognize this situation

Signed-off-by: Qiang Liu <liuq131@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index a2b16b08cbbf..6009f5d1021a 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
  	 * pages requested were isolated. If there were any failures, 0 is
  	 * returned and CMA will fail.
  	 */
-	if (strict && blockpfn < end_pfn)
+	if (strict && (blockpfn < end_pfn || total_isolated != nr_scanned))
  		total_isolated = 0;
cc->total_free_scanned += nr_scanned;




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux