On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 09:46:07AM -0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 11:39:30AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Paul reported kfree from IRQ context in scftorture which is noticed by > > lockdep since the recent PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING switch. > > > > The last patch in this series adresses the issues, the other things > > happened on the way. > > > > v2...v3: > > - The clean up on module exit must not be done with thread numbers. > > Reported by Boqun Feng. > > - Move the clean up on module exit prior to torture_cleanup_end(). > > Reported by Paul. > > > > v1...v2: > > - Remove kfree_bulk(). I get more invocations per report without it. > > - Pass `cpu' to scf_cleanup_free_list in scftorture_invoker() instead > > of scfp->cpu. The latter is the thread number which can be larger > > than the number CPUs leading to a crash in such a case. Reported by > > Boqun Feng. > > - Clean up the per-CPU lists on module exit. Reported by Boqun Feng. > > > > Sebastian > > > > For the whole series: > > Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> Thank you both! Sebastian, I am guessing that the Kconfig change exposing the bugs fixed by your series is headed to mainline for the upcoming merge window? If so, I should of course push these in as well. Thanx, Paul
