On 2024-11-04 17:00:19 [-0800], Boqun Feng wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Boqun, … > I think this needs to be: > > scf_cleanup_free_list(cpu); > > or > > scf_cleanup_free_list(curcpu); > > because scfp->cpu is actually the thread number, and I got a NULL > dereference: > > [ 14.219225] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffb2ff7210 Right. Replaced with cpu. … > > Another thing is, how do we guarantee that we don't exit the loop > eariler (i.e. while there are still callbacks on the list)? After the > following scftorture_invoke_one(), there could an IPI pending somewhere, > and we may exit this loop if torture_must_stop() is true. And that IPI > might add its scf_check to the list but no scf_cleanup_free_list() is > going to handle that, right? Okay. Assuming that IPIs are done by the time scf_torture_cleanup is invoked, I added scf_cleanup_free_list() for all CPUs there. Reposted at https://lore.kernel.org/20241107111821.3417762-1-bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Regards, > Boqun Sebastian