Re: [PATCH v3] mm: count zeromap read and set for swapout and swapin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 10:44 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:00:47 +1300 Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 9:42 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:01:14 +1300 Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oops, it seems that it depends on Kanchana's 'mm: change count_objcg_event() to
> > > > count_objcg_events() for batch event updates,' which also isn't present in 6.12.
> > > >
> > > > Otherwise, it won't build, as reported here:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAGsJ_4whD31+Lk0m2uq-o=ygvkRsw1uXcPeqxBONV-RUXkeEzg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > argh.
> > >
> >
> > Apologies for the inconvenience.
> >
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > > What’s the best approach here? Should we include Kanchana's patch that extends
> > > > the nr argument for count_objcg_events() in 6.12-rc as well?
> > >
> > > Let's do the right thing here.  I'll drop this patch from mm-hotfixes.
> > > Please send a v4 against Linus mainline fairly soon then I'll redo
> > > Kanchana's series around that.
> >
> > Alright. The question is whether we should integrate Kanchana's 'mm:
> > change count_objcg_event() to count_objcg_events() for batch event
> > updates' into 'mm: count zeromap read and set for swapout and swapin,'
> > or keep it as a separate patch as patch 1/2?
> >
> > I guess integration would be better, as hotfixes may not be ideal for a patch
> > series?
>
> I don't fully understand what you're asking here.
>
> I'm suggesting that you prepare a minimal patch that fixes the bug in
> Linus's kernel.  Then we figure out what to do with Kanchana's 6.13-rc1
> material after the bugfix is sorted out.

Kanchana's commit 'mm: change count_objcg_event() to count_objcg_events()'
changes count_objcg_event() to count_objcg_events() and supports
nr_pages more than 1. This is what we need for the minimal patch of
fixing zeromap
as zeromap could be nr_pages > 1 for large folios.

So my question is that, do I combine Kanchana's change into my patch
and send a single patch, or do I send a patch series with 2 patches:

1: Kanchana's mm: change count_objcg_event() to count_objcg_events()
2: mm: count zeromap read and set for swapout and swapin

If we combine them into a single patch, I'll need to incorporate the changes
from 1 into 2. I'm also unsure how to acknowledge Kanchana's contribution
—perhaps mark it as co-developed?

Cc'd Kanchana as well.

Thanks
barry





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux