On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 02:44, Junaid Shahid <junaids@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In any case, I guess we could just mark these functions as plain noinstr. I wonder if it also would be worth having something like /* * Inline this function so it can be called from noinstr, * but it wouldn't actually care itself about being instrumented. */ #define inline_for_noinstr __always_inline Maybe there are already __always_inline functions this would apply to. Then again, if you care about inlining them so much that you can't just write "noinstr", then it's probably hot/small enough that __always_inline would make sense regardless of noinstr. Probably I'm over-thinking it at this point.
