On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 07:17:28AM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote: >* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [241031 04:02]: >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:29:39AM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote: >> >* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [241022 19:32]: >> >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 01:37:50AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> >> >Hi Wei, >> >> > >> >> >kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: >> >> > >> >> >[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable] >> >> >[also build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.12-rc4 next-20241022] >> >> >[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. >> >> >And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in >> >> >https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] >> >> > >> >> >url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wei-Yang/maple_tree-print-empty-for-an-empty-tree-on-mt_dump/20241019-103832 >> >> >base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-nonmm-unstable >> >> >patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241019023716.4516-6-richard.weiyang%40gmail.com >> >> >patch subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null >> >> >config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20241022 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) >> >> >compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff) >> >> >reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) >> >> > >> >> >If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of >> >> >the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags >> >> >| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> >| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ >> >> > >> >> >sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> >> >>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@ >> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry >> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root >> >> >>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@ >> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry >> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root >> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@ >> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry >> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root >> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@ >> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry >> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root >> >> > >> >> >vim +1456 lib/test_maple_tree.c >> >> > >> >> > 1389 >> >> > 1390 static noinline void __init check_store_null(struct maple_tree *mt) >> >> > 1391 { >> >> > 1392 MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, ULONG_MAX); >> >> > 1393 >> >> > 1394 /* >> >> > 1395 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to an empty tree should result >> >> > 1396 * in an empty tree >> >> > 1397 */ >> >> > 1398 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE); >> >> > 1399 mas_lock(&mas); >> >> > 1400 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL); >> >> > 1401 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt)); >> >> > 1402 mas_unlock(&mas); >> >> > 1403 mtree_destroy(mt); >> >> > 1404 >> >> > 1405 /* >> >> > 1406 * Store NULL at any range to an empty tree should result in an empty >> >> > 1407 * tree >> >> > 1408 */ >> >> > 1409 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE); >> >> > 1410 mas_lock(&mas); >> >> > 1411 mas_set_range(&mas, 3, 10); >> >> > 1412 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL); >> >> > 1413 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt)); >> >> > 1414 mas_unlock(&mas); >> >> > 1415 mtree_destroy(mt); >> >> > 1416 >> >> > 1417 /* >> >> > 1418 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a single entry tree should >> >> > 1419 * result in an empty tree >> >> > 1420 */ >> >> > 1421 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE); >> >> > 1422 mas_lock(&mas); >> >> > 1423 mas_set(&mas, 0); >> >> > 1424 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL); >> >> > 1425 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX); >> >> > 1426 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL); >> >> > 1427 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt)); >> >> > 1428 mas_unlock(&mas); >> >> > 1429 mtree_destroy(mt); >> >> > 1430 >> >> > 1431 /* >> >> > 1432 * Store NULL at range [0, n] to a single entry tree should >> >> > 1433 * result in an empty tree >> >> > 1434 */ >> >> > 1435 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE); >> >> > 1436 mas_lock(&mas); >> >> > 1437 mas_set(&mas, 0); >> >> > 1438 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL); >> >> > 1439 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, 5); >> >> > 1440 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL); >> >> > 1441 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt)); >> >> > 1442 mas_unlock(&mas); >> >> > 1443 mtree_destroy(mt); >> >> > 1444 >> >> > 1445 /* >> >> > 1446 * Store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree >> >> > 1447 * should still be a single entry tree >> >> > 1448 */ >> >> > 1449 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE); >> >> > 1450 mas_lock(&mas); >> >> > 1451 mas_set(&mas, 0); >> >> > 1452 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL); >> >> > 1453 mas_set_range(&mas, 2, 5); >> >> > 1454 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL); >> >> > 1455 MT_BUG_ON(mt, mtree_empty(mt)); >> >> >> 1456 MT_BUG_ON(mt, xa_is_node(mt->ma_root)); >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Will fix it to xa_is_node(mas_root(&mas)) in next version. >> > >> >By the looks of the bot output, there are quite a lot of existing cases >> >of this in the test code. >> > >> >> Hi, Liam >> >> Thanks for your review. I may not follow you. >> >> I saw you add you RB. Do you prefer me to spin a new round with this adjusted >> or the current version is fine? > >Please fix what you added. The rest will need to eventually be fixed, >but someone can do that later. > Got it, thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 1457 mas_unlock(&mas); >> >> > 1458 mtree_destroy(mt); >> >> > 1459 >> >> > 1460 /* >> >> > 1461 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a tree with node should >> >> > 1462 * result in an empty tree >> >> > 1463 */ >> >> > 1464 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE); >> >> > 1465 mas_lock(&mas); >> >> > 1466 mas_set_range(&mas, 1, 3); >> >> > 1467 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL); >> >> > 1468 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !xa_is_node(mt->ma_root)); >> >> > 1469 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX); >> >> > 1470 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL); >> >> > 1471 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt)); >> >> > 1472 mas_unlock(&mas); >> >> > 1473 mtree_destroy(mt); >> >> > 1474 } >> >> > 1475 >> >> > >> >> >-- >> >> >0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service >> >> >https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Wei Yang >> >> Help you, Help me >> >> -- >> Wei Yang >> Help you, Help me -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
