On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 05:28:49PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 05:02:23PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > That's what I meant (untested, on top of -next as it has a MAP_HUGETLB > > check in there). I don't think it's much worse than your proposal, > > assuming that it works: > > Right sorry misread. Yeah this is better, let me do a quick -v4 then! Thanks! > Cheers, sorry pretty tired at this stage, was looking at this all last > night... No worries. The way we handle MTE is pretty convoluted. Happy to simplify it if we find a better way. -- Catalin
