* Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx> [241029 07:52]: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 06:01:07PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 09:48:31AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > Performance analysis using branch annotation on a fleet of 200 hosts > > > running web servers revealed that the 'likely' hint in > > > > To be pedantic: *unlikely > > > > > vms_gather_munmap_vmas() was 100% consistently incorrect. In all > > > observed cases, the branch behavior contradicted the hint. > > > > OK so this is probably because vm_mmap_pgoff() declares the userfaultfd > > list head on the stack then passes it into do_mmap() and threads all the > > way to this code... and yeah, so that would be 100%. > > > > There are other code paths that aren't 100%, but the system call one is. > > > > Nice spot! > > > > > > > > Remove the 'unlikely' qualifier from the condition checking 'vms->uf'. > > > By doing so, we allow the compiler to make optimization decisions based > > > on its own heuristics and profiling data, rather than relying on a > > > static hint that has proven to be inaccurate in real-world scenarios. > > > > Yeah I'm generally not in favour of 'vibes' based likely()/unlikely(), I > > think it should always be based on profiling. > > > > It's understandable that there would be this expectation, and it may have > > migrated from other code that already had this check in where perhaps it > > wasn't always referencing a stack object, but yeah this is just wrong. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Liam will want a look too when he's back next week. > > Liam, are you OK with this one? I suspect that Andrew is waiting for > your review before merging it. I'm fine with removing the unlikely. This begs for a refactoring considering we are calling a function in fs/userfaultfd on every vma on every munmap operation in this call path. Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Looks good to me though! > > > > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > mm/vma.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/vma.c b/mm/vma.c > > > index 4737afcb064c..9d4fe794dd07 100644 > > > --- a/mm/vma.c > > > +++ b/mm/vma.c > > > @@ -1250,7 +1250,7 @@ int vms_gather_munmap_vmas(struct vma_munmap_struct *vms, > > > else if (is_data_mapping(next->vm_flags)) > > > vms->data_vm += nrpages; > > > > > > - if (unlikely(vms->uf)) { > > > + if (vms->uf) { > > > /* > > > * If userfaultfd_unmap_prep returns an error the vmas > > > * will remain split, but userland will get a > > > -- > > > 2.43.5 > > >