On 2024/10/25 19:16, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: ... >> >> You and Jesper seems to be mentioning a possible fact that there might >> be 'hundreds of gigs of memory' needed for inflight pages, it would be nice >> to provide more info or reasoning above why 'hundreds of gigs of memory' is >> needed here so that we don't do a over-designed thing to support recording >> unlimited in-flight pages if the driver unbound stalling turns out impossible >> and the inflight pages do need to be recorded. > > I don't have a concrete example of a use that will blow the limit you > are setting (but maybe Jesper does), I am simply objecting to the > arbitrary imposing of any limit at all. It smells a lot of "640k ought > to be enough for anyone".
