Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: bpf_csum_diff: optimize and homogenize for all archs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Puranjay,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
>
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Puranjay-Mohan/net-checksum-move-from32to16-to-generic-header/20241023-234347
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023153922.86909-3-puranjay%40kernel.org
> patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: bpf_csum_diff: optimize and homogenize for all archs
> config: i386-randconfig-061-20241025 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241025/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
> compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241025/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>    net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@     got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse:     expected struct sock_filter const *filter
>    net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse:     got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
>    net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@     got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse:     expected struct sock_filter const *filter
>    net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse:     got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
>    net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr @@     got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh @@
>    net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse:     expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr
>    net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse:     got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh
>    net/core/filter.c:10993:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11000:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11004:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11013:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11017:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xdp_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11029:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11035:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11039:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11045:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11049:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11055:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11059:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11066:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11070:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11076:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11079:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11085:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11088:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11094:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11097:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11103:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11106:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11113:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11116:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11123:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11126:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11132:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11460:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11466:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11668:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:11672:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@     got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse:     expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
>    net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse:     got unsigned long long [usertype] to
>    net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old @@     got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse:     expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old
>    net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse:     got unsigned long long [usertype] from
>    net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new @@     got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse:     expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new
>    net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse:     got unsigned long long [usertype] to
>    net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@     got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse:     expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
>    net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse:     got unsigned long long [usertype] from
>    net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@     got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse:     expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
>    net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse:     got unsigned long long [usertype] to
>    net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@     got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse:     expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
>    net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse:     got unsigned long long [usertype] to
>    net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from @@     got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse:     expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from
>    net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse:     got unsigned long long [usertype] from
>    net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to @@     got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse:     expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to
>    net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse:     got unsigned long long [usertype] to
>    net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@     got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse:     expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
>    net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse:     got unsigned long long [usertype] from
>    net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@     expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@     got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
>    net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse:     expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
>    net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse:     got unsigned long long [usertype] to
>>> net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@     expected unsigned int sum @@     got restricted __wsum @@
>    net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse:     expected unsigned int sum
>    net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse:     got restricted __wsum
>    net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@     expected unsigned int sum @@     got restricted __wsum @@
>    net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse:     expected unsigned int sum
>    net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse:     got restricted __wsum
>    net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@     expected unsigned int sum @@     got restricted __wsum @@
>    net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse:     expected unsigned int sum
>    net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse:     got restricted __wsum
>    net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@     expected unsigned long long @@     got restricted __wsum [usertype] seed @@
>    net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse:     expected unsigned long long
>    net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse:     got restricted __wsum [usertype] seed
>    net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@     expected unsigned long long @@     got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum @@
>    net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse:     expected unsigned long long
>    net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse:     got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum
>
> vim +2023 net/core/filter.c
>
>   2009	
>   2010	BPF_CALL_5(bpf_csum_diff, __be32 *, from, u32, from_size,
>   2011		   __be32 *, to, u32, to_size, __wsum, seed)
>   2012	{
>   2013		/* This is quite flexible, some examples:
>   2014		 *
>   2015		 * from_size == 0, to_size > 0,  seed := csum --> pushing data
>   2016		 * from_size > 0,  to_size == 0, seed := csum --> pulling data
>   2017		 * from_size > 0,  to_size > 0,  seed := 0    --> diffing data
>   2018		 *
>   2019		 * Even for diffing, from_size and to_size don't need to be equal.
>   2020		 */
>   2021	
>   2022		if (from_size && to_size)
>> 2023			return csum_from32to16(csum_sub(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed),
>   2024							csum_partial(from, from_size, 0)));
>   2025		if (to_size)
>   2026			return csum_from32to16(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed));
>   2027	
>   2028		if (from_size)
>   2029			return csum_from32to16(~csum_partial(from, from_size, ~seed));
>   2030	
>   2031		return seed;
>   2032	}
>   2033	

This file has a lot of such sparse warnings. Specifically, to fix the
warning introduced by me, I can apply the following diff:

--- >8 ---

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index e00bec7de9ed..b94037f29b2a 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -2019,16 +2019,18 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_csum_diff, __be32 *, from, u32, from_size,
         * Even for diffing, from_size and to_size don't need to be equal.
         */

+       __wsum ret = seed;
+
        if (from_size && to_size)
-               return csum_from32to16(csum_sub(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed),
-                                               csum_partial(from, from_size, 0)));
+               ret = csum_sub(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed), csum_partial(from, from_size, 0));
+
        if (to_size)
-               return csum_from32to16(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed));
+               ret =  csum_partial(to, to_size, seed);

        if (from_size)
-               return csum_from32to16(~csum_partial(from, from_size, ~seed));
+               ret = ~csum_partial(from, from_size, ~seed);

-       return seed;
+       return csum_from32to16((__force unsigned int)ret);
 }

--- 8< ---

If others feel that fixing these warnings is useful, I can send another
version with above diff. I will then also send a separate patch to fix
all other such warnings in this file.


Thanks,
Puranjay

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux