On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 2:00 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:07:58 -0700 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > To simplify later changes to page tag references, introduce new
> > pgtag_ref_handle type. This allows easy replacement of page_ext
> > as a storage of page allocation tags.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > static inline void pgalloc_tag_copy(struct folio *new, struct folio *old)
> > {
> > + union pgtag_ref_handle handle;
> > + union codetag_ref ref;
> > struct alloc_tag *tag;
> > - union codetag_ref *ref;
> >
> > tag = pgalloc_tag_get(&old->page);
> > if (!tag)
> > return;
> >
> > - ref = get_page_tag_ref(&new->page);
> > - if (!ref)
> > + if (!get_page_tag_ref(&new->page, &ref, &handle))
> > return;
> >
> > /* Clear the old ref to the original allocation tag. */
> > clear_page_tag_ref(&old->page);
> > /* Decrement the counters of the tag on get_new_folio. */
> > - alloc_tag_sub(ref, folio_nr_pages(new));
> > -
> > - __alloc_tag_ref_set(ref, tag);
> > -
> > - put_page_tag_ref(ref);
> > + alloc_tag_sub(&ref, folio_nr_pages(new));
>
> mm-stable has folio_size(new) here, fixed up.
Oh, right. You merged that patch tonight and I formatted my patchset
yesterday :)
Thanks for the fixup.
>
> I think we aleady discussed this, but there's a crazy amount of
> inlining here. pgalloc_tag_split() is huge, and has four callsites.
I must have missed that discussion but I am happy to unline this
function. I think splitting is heavy enough operation that this
uninlining would not have be noticeable.
Thanks!
