[PATCH 01/13] mm, swap: minor clean up for swap entry allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Direct reclaim can skip the whole folio after reclaimed a set of
folio based slots. Also simplify the code for allocation, reduce
indention.

Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/swapfile.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 46bd4b1a3c07..1128cea95c47 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -604,23 +604,28 @@ static bool cluster_reclaim_range(struct swap_info_struct *si,
 				  unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
 	unsigned char *map = si->swap_map;
-	unsigned long offset;
+	unsigned long offset = start;
+	int nr_reclaim;
 
 	spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
 	spin_unlock(&si->lock);
 
-	for (offset = start; offset < end; offset++) {
+	do {
 		switch (READ_ONCE(map[offset])) {
 		case 0:
-			continue;
+			offset++;
+			break;
 		case SWAP_HAS_CACHE:
-			if (__try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset, TTRS_ANYWAY | TTRS_DIRECT) > 0)
-				continue;
-			goto out;
+			nr_reclaim = __try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset, TTRS_ANYWAY | TTRS_DIRECT);
+			if (nr_reclaim > 0)
+				offset += nr_reclaim;
+			else
+				goto out;
+			break;
 		default:
 			goto out;
 		}
-	}
+	} while (offset < end);
 out:
 	spin_lock(&si->lock);
 	spin_lock(&ci->lock);
@@ -826,35 +831,30 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
 							 &found, order, usage);
 			frags++;
 			if (found)
-				break;
+				goto done;
 		}
 
-		if (!found) {
+		/*
+		 * Nonfull clusters are moved to frag tail if we reached
+		 * here, count them too, don't over scan the frag list.
+		 */
+		while (frags < si->frag_cluster_nr[order]) {
+			ci = list_first_entry(&si->frag_clusters[order],
+					      struct swap_cluster_info, list);
 			/*
-			 * Nonfull clusters are moved to frag tail if we reached
-			 * here, count them too, don't over scan the frag list.
+			 * Rotate the frag list to iterate, they were all failing
+			 * high order allocation or moved here due to per-CPU usage,
+			 * this help keeping usable cluster ahead.
 			 */
-			while (frags < si->frag_cluster_nr[order]) {
-				ci = list_first_entry(&si->frag_clusters[order],
-						      struct swap_cluster_info, list);
-				/*
-				 * Rotate the frag list to iterate, they were all failing
-				 * high order allocation or moved here due to per-CPU usage,
-				 * this help keeping usable cluster ahead.
-				 */
-				list_move_tail(&ci->list, &si->frag_clusters[order]);
-				offset = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, cluster_offset(si, ci),
-								 &found, order, usage);
-				frags++;
-				if (found)
-					break;
-			}
+			list_move_tail(&ci->list, &si->frag_clusters[order]);
+			offset = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, cluster_offset(si, ci),
+							 &found, order, usage);
+			frags++;
+			if (found)
+				goto done;
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (found)
-		goto done;
-
 	if (!list_empty(&si->discard_clusters)) {
 		/*
 		 * we don't have free cluster but have some clusters in
@@ -892,7 +892,6 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
 				goto done;
 		}
 	}
-
 done:
 	cluster->next[order] = offset;
 	return found;
-- 
2.47.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux