According to the logic of damon_va_evenly_split_region(), currently following split case would not meet the expectation: Suppose DAMON_MIN_REGION=0x1000, Case: Split [0x0, 0x3000) into 2 pieces, then the result would be acutually 3 regions: [0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x2000), [0x2000, 0x3000) but NOT the expected 2 regions: [0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x3000) !!! The root cause is that when calculating size of each split piece in damon_va_evenly_split_region(): `sz_piece = ALIGN_DOWN(sz_orig / nr_pieces, DAMON_MIN_REGION);` both the dividing and the ALIGN_DOWN may cause loss of precision, then each time split one piece of size 'sz_piece' from origin 'start' to 'end' would cause more pieces are split out than expected!!! To fix it, count for each piece split and make sure no more than 'nr_pieces'. In addition, add above case into damon_test_split_evenly(). And add 'nr_piece == 1' check in damon_va_evenly_split_region() for better code readability and add a corresponding kunit testcase. Zheng Yejian (2): mm/damon/vaddr: Fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region() mm/damon/vaddr: Check 'nr_piece == 1' case in damon_va_evenly_split_region() mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h | 2 ++ mm/damon/vaddr.c | 7 +++++-- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1