On Mon 21-10-24 11:10:50, Yu Zhao wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:13 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat 19-10-24 23:13:15, Yu Zhao wrote: > > > OOM kills due to vastly overestimated free highatomic reserves were > > > observed: > > > > > > ... invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x100cca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE), order=0 ... > > > Node 0 Normal free:1482936kB boost:0kB min:410416kB low:739404kB high:1068392kB reserved_highatomic:1073152KB ... > > > Node 0 Normal: 1292*4kB (ME) 1920*8kB (E) 383*16kB (UE) 220*32kB (ME) 340*64kB (E) 2155*128kB (UE) 3243*256kB (UE) 615*512kB (U) 1*1024kB (M) 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 1477408kB > > > > > > The second line above shows that the OOM kill was due to the following > > > condition: > > > > > > free (1482936kB) - reserved_highatomic (1073152kB) = 409784KB < min (410416kB) > > > > > > And the third line shows there were no free pages in any > > > MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC pageblocks, which otherwise would show up as type > > > 'H'. Therefore __zone_watermark_unusable_free() overestimated free > > > highatomic reserves. IOW, it underestimated the usable free memory by > > > over 1GB, which resulted in the unnecessary OOM kill. > > > > Why doesn't unreserve_highatomic_pageblock deal with this situation? > > The current behavior of unreserve_highatomic_pageblock() seems WAI to > me: it unreserves highatomic pageblocks that contain *free* pages so > that those pages can become usable to others. There is nothing to > unreserve when they have no free pages. I do not follow. How can you have reserved highatomic pages of that size without having page blocks with free memory. In other words is this an accounting problem or reserves problem? This is not really clear from your description. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
