On 10/16/24 14:51, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> The acquired memory blocks for reserved may include blocks outside of
> memory management. In this case, the nid variable is set to NUMA_NO_NODE
> (-1), so an error occurs in node_set().
> This adds a check using numa_valid_node() to numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug()
> that skips node_set() when nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE.
>
> Fixes: 87482708210f ("mm: introduce numa_memblks")
> Cc: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/numa_memblks.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> v2:
> - Use numa_valid_node() instead of check.
> - Add Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> - Update description.
> - Drop RFC from subject.
>
> diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c
> index be52b93a9c58..a3877e9bc878 100644
> --- a/mm/numa_memblks.c
> +++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c
> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void)
> for_each_reserved_mem_region(mb_region) {
> int nid = memblock_get_region_node(mb_region);
>
> - if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES)
> + if (numa_valid_node(nid))
> node_set(nid, reserved_nodemask);
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
