On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:22:17 +0200, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote: > a question about which sleeping function should be used in acpi_os_sleep() > started a discussion and examination about the existing documentation and > implementation of functions which insert a sleep/delay. > > The result of the discussion was, that the documentation is outdated and > the implemented fsleep() reflects the outdated documentation but doesn't > help to reflect reality which in turns leads to the queue which covers the > following things: > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next Thanks! [11/16] regulator: core: Use fsleep() to get best sleep mechanism commit: f20669fbcf99d0e15e94fb50929bb1c41618e197 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
