On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:37 AM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 1:50 AM zhaoyang.huang <zhaoyang.huang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The test case of [1] leads to system hang which caused by a local
> > watchdog thread starved over 20s on a 5.5GB RAM ANDROID15(v6.6)
> > system. This commit solve the issue by have the reclaimer be throttled
> > and increase min_seq if both page types reach MIN_NR_GENS, which may
> > introduce a livelock of switching type with holding lruvec->lru_lock.
> >
> > [1]
> > launch below script 8 times simutanously which allocates 1GB virtual
> > memory and access it from user space by each thread.
> > $ costmem -c1024000 -b12800 -o0 &
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/vmscan.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index cfa839284b92..83e450d0ce3c 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -4384,11 +4384,23 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
> > int remaining = MAX_LRU_BATCH;
> > struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
> > struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
> > + struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
> >
> > VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(list));
> >
> > - if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) == MIN_NR_GENS)
> > - return 0;
> > + if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) == MIN_NR_GENS) {
> > + /*
> > + * throttle for a while and then increase the min_seq since
> > + * both page types reach the limit.
> > + */
>
> Sorry but this isn't going to work because in try_to_inc_min_seq(), there is
> `while (min_seq[type] + MIN_NR_GENS <= lrugen->max_seq) {`
> to prevent reclaimers from evicting hot memory -- they need to do aging first.
Thanks for heads up. What I thought was assuming there is a running
reclaimer will do the aging and the throttled reclaimers increase the
min_seq when scheduled back and move on. Or could we just drop the
lock and throttle for a while to avoid a livelock on 'type = !type'
with holding the lock?
>
> >
> > + if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, !type) == MIN_NR_GENS) {
> > + spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
> > + reclaim_throttle(pgdat, VMSCAN_THROTTLE_ISOLATED);
> > + spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
> > + try_to_inc_min_seq(lruvec, get_swappiness(lruvec, sc));
> > + } else
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> >
> > gen = lru_gen_from_seq(lrugen->min_seq[type]);
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
