From: Sidhartha <sidhartha.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
In mas_wr_store_type(), we check if new_end < mt_slots[wr_mas->type]. If
this check fails, we know that ,after this, new_end is >= mt_min_slots.
Checking this again when we detect a wr_node_store later in the function
is reduntant. Because this check is part of an OR statement, the statement
will always evaluate to true, therefore we can just get rid of it.
Suggested-by; Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/maple_tree.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
index 4b423330d83c..f5a12d37b352 100644
--- a/lib/maple_tree.c
+++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
@@ -4252,14 +4252,7 @@ static inline void mas_wr_store_type(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas)
return;
}
- if (mte_is_root(mas->node) || (new_end >= mt_min_slots[wr_mas->type]) ||
- (mas->mas_flags & MA_STATE_BULK)) {
- mas->store_type = wr_node_store;
- return;
- }
-
- mas->store_type = wr_invalid;
- MAS_WARN_ON(mas, 1);
+ mas->store_type = wr_node_store;
}
/**
--
2.43.0
