On 10/8/24 13:52, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 8 Oct 2024, at 4:26, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
>>
>> I remember we discussed that in the past and that we do *not* want to sprinkle these CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON checks all over the kernel.
>>
>> Ideally, we'd use GFP_ZERO and have the buddy just do that for us? There is the slight chance that we zero-out when we're not going to use the allocated folio, but ... that can happen either way even with the current code?
>
> I agree that putting CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON here is not ideal, but
Create some nice inline wrapper for the test and it will look less ugly? :)
> folio_zero_user() uses vmf->address to improve cache performance by changing
> subpage clearing order. See commit c79b57e462b5 ("mm: hugetlb: clear target
> sub-page last when clearing huge page”). If we use GFP_ZERO, we lose this
> optimization. To keep it, vmf->address will need to be passed to allocation
> code. Maybe that is acceptable?
I'd rather not change the page allocation code for this...
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi
