Re: [PATCH] Fixes: null pointer dereference in pfnmap_lockdep_assert

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peter, thanks for reviewing.

On 03.10.2024 12:41, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 09:31:06PM +0530, Manas via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Manas <manas18244@xxxxxxxxxxx>

syzbot has pointed to a possible null pointer dereference in
pfnmap_lockdep_assert. vm_file member of vm_area_struct is being
dereferenced without any checks.

This fix returns if vm_file member in vm_area_struct is NULL.

Reported-by: syzbot+093d096417e7038a689b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=093d096417e7038a689b
---
This bug[1] triggers a general protection fault in follow_pfnmap_start
function. An assertion pfnmap_lockdep_assert inside this function
dereferences vm_file member of vm_area_struct. And panic gets triggered
when vm_file is NULL.

This patch returns from the assertion pfnmap_lockdep_assert if vm_file
is found to be NULL.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=093d096417e7038a689b

Signed-off-by: Manas <manas18244@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the patch!

---
 mm/memory.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 2366578015ad..b152a95e543f 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -6346,6 +6346,9 @@ static inline void pfnmap_args_setup(struct follow_pfnmap_args *args,
 static inline void pfnmap_lockdep_assert(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+	if (!vma->vm_file)
+		return;
+

Hmm I guess I wasn't careful enough here as I was mostly only thinking
about file mappings, but I just notice we have other pfnmaps like the vvar
mappings.. the mapping var can also already be reused later when available.

Logically even if !vm_file we can still check against mmap write lock.  So
would it be better to do this instead:

       struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file && vma->vm_file->f_mapping;

This will lead to `-Wint-conversion` error in the assignment. We can either do a
cast like the following:

        struct address_space *mapping = (struct address_space *)(vma->vm_file && vma->vm_file->f_mapping);

But I am not sure if it is the canonical way of doing it. It will also lead to
warning about pointer from integer casting.

Or will a conditional like this work here?

        struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file ? vma->vm_file->f_mapping : NULL;
       if (mapping)
               lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem) ||
                              lockdep_is_held(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_lock));
       else
               lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_lock));

?


 	struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;

 	if (mapping)

---
base-commit: 9852d85ec9d492ebef56dc5f229416c925758edc
change-id: 20241003-fix-null-deref-6bfa0337efc3

Best regards,
--
Manas <manas18244@xxxxxxxxxxx>




--
Peter Xu


--
Manas




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux