Re: [PATCH 33/33] kselftest/riscv: kselftest for user mode cfi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/3/24 05:03, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 05:18:36PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 10/1/24 10:06, Deepak Gupta wrote:

+#ifndef __NR_prctl
+#define __NR_prctl 167
+#endif

+#ifndef __NR_map_shadow_stack
+#define __NR_map_shadow_stack 453

Why do we need to define these? Shouldn't including
asm-generic/unistd.h sufficient?

We have this issue on arm64 as well, there's some issue with directly
pulling in the asm header interfering with libc in some situation (I
can't immediately figure out which situation or which libc to remind
myself what it is though...) so we've got local defines like we do for
the NT_ defines for ptrace.  I see x86 is doing the same.

It would be nice to figure. There have been some issues reported due
to local defines - the test fails if the define happens to not match.

Does including <asm/unistd.h> fix the problem?

thanks,
-- Shuah




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux