Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] memcg: vfs isolation in memory cgroup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> I haven't thought about the NUMA and node awareness for the shrinkers,
> and that sounds like something
> beyond than the problem I am trying to solve here. I might need to
> think a bit more of how that fits into the problem you described.

The memory failure code would also benefit from more directed slab
(especially d/icache) freeing method. Right now if it wants to hard/soft
offline a slab page it has to take the big hammer and free as much as it
can, just in the hope to free that one page.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]