[..] > > > Performance Testing: > > > ==================== > > > > > > We list the data for 64K folios with before/after data per-compressor, > > > followed by the same for 2M pmd-mappable folios. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > 64K folios: zstd: > > > ================= > > > > > > zswap compressor zstd zstd zstd zstd v8 > > > before-case1 before-case2 after vs. vs. > > > case1 case2 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Total throughput (KB/s) 5,222,213 1,076,611 6,227,367 19% 478% > > > Average throughput (KB/s) 174,073 35,887 207,578 19% 478% > > > elapsed time (sec) 120.50 347.16 109.21 9% 69% > > > > > > The diff here is supposed to be negative, right? > > (Same for the below results) > > So this is supposed to be positive to indicate the throughput improvement > [(new-old)/old] with v8 as compared to the before-case1 and before-case2. > For latency, a positive value indicates the latency reducing, since I calculate > [(old-new)/old]. This is the metric used throughout. > > Based on this convention, positive percentages are improvements in both, > throughput and latency. But you use negative percentages for sys time, we should at least be consistent with this.
