Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] hazptr: Add initial implementation of hazard pointers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 9/27/2024 um 8:13 PM schrieb Linus Torvalds:

Because even hiding the value one from the compiler will mean that it
can't use the comparison to decide that the originals are equal, even
if one of them is unhidden.

No?

               Linus

I think it depends on which one you hide.

If you do

 z = b;
 hide(z);
 if (a==z) { *b; }

then it will be fine, because it knows a==z but nothing about the relation of b with a or z.


But for

 z = a;
 hide(z);
 if (z==b) { *b; }

then it would still know that b == z, and could replace *b with *z (which really is *a).


Best wishes,
  jonas







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux