On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 5:42 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS depends on "NR_CPUS >= 4". Unfortunately, that evaluates > to true if there is no NR_CPUS configuration option. This results in > CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS=y for mac_defconfig. This in turn causes the m68k > "q800" and "virt" machines to crash in qemu if debugging options are > enabled. > > Making CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS dependent on the existence of NR_CPUS > does not work since a dependency on the existence of a numeric Kconfig > entry always evaluates to false. Example: > > config HAVE_NO_NR_CPUS > def_bool y > depends on !NR_CPUS > > After adding this to a Kconfig file, "make defconfig" includes: > $ grep NR_CPUS .config > CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64 > CONFIG_HAVE_NO_NR_CPUS=y > > Defining NR_CPUS for m68k does not help either since many architectures > define NR_CPUS only for SMP configurations. > > Make SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS depend on SMP instead to solve the problem. > > Fixes: 394290cba966 ("mm: turn USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS / USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS into Kconfig options") > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- a/mm/Kconfig > +++ b/mm/Kconfig > @@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ config ARCH_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_ENABLE > config SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS > def_bool y > depends on MMU > + depends on SMP > depends on NR_CPUS >= 4 Nit: please combine these two lines, to make it clear they are related. > depends on !ARM || CPU_CACHE_VIPT > depends on !PARISC || PA20 Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds