Re: [PATCH] mm: Move set_pxd_safe() helpers from generic to platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/20/24 14:12, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/20/24 12:09, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 20.09.24 07:30, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> set_pxd_safe() helpers that serve a specific purpose for both x86 and riscv
>>> platforms, do not need to be in the common memory code. Otherwise they just
>>> unnecessarily make the common API more complicated. This moves the helpers
>>> from common code to platform instead.
>>>
>>> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++
>>>   arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h   | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   include/linux/pgtable.h          | 38 --------------------------------
>>>   3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> index 089f3c9f56a3..39ca652c5ebe 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> @@ -957,6 +957,25 @@ void misc_mem_init(void);
>>>   extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned long)];
>>>   #define ZERO_PAGE(vaddr) (virt_to_page(empty_zero_page))
>>>   +/*
>>> + * Use set_p*_safe(), and elide TLB flushing, when confident that *no*
>>> + * TLB flush will be required as a result of the "set". For example, use
>>> + * in scenarios where it is known ahead of time that the routine is
>>> + * setting non-present entries, or re-setting an existing entry to the
>>> + * same value. Otherwise, use the typical "set" helpers and flush the
>>> + * TLB.
>>> + */
>>> +#define set_p4d_safe(p4dp, p4d) \
>>> +({ \
>>> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(p4d_present(*p4dp) && !p4d_same(*p4dp, p4d)); \
>>> +    set_p4d(p4dp, p4d); \
>>> +})
>>> +
>>> +#define set_pgd_safe(pgdp, pgd) \
>>> +({ \
>>> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(pgd_present(*pgdp) && !pgd_same(*pgdp, pgd)); \
>>> +    set_pgd(pgdp, pgd); \
>>> +})
>>>   #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>>>     #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_PGTABLE_H */
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> index e39311a89bf4..fefb52bb6b4d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> @@ -1701,6 +1701,43 @@ bool arch_is_platform_page(u64 paddr);
>>>   #define arch_is_platform_page arch_is_platform_page
>>>   #endif
>>>   +/*
>>> + * Use set_p*_safe(), and elide TLB flushing, when confident that *no*
>>> + * TLB flush will be required as a result of the "set". For example, use
>>> + * in scenarios where it is known ahead of time that the routine is
>>> + * setting non-present entries, or re-setting an existing entry to the
>>> + * same value. Otherwise, use the typical "set" helpers and flush the
>>> + * TLB.
>>> + */
>>> +#define set_pte_safe(ptep, pte) \
>>> +({ \
>>> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(pte_present(*ptep) && !pte_same(*ptep, pte)); \
>>> +    set_pte(ptep, pte); \
>>> +})
>>> +
>>> +#define set_pmd_safe(pmdp, pmd) \
>>> +({ \
>>> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(pmd_present(*pmdp) && !pmd_same(*pmdp, pmd)); \
>>> +    set_pmd(pmdp, pmd); \
>>> +})
>>> +
>>> +#define set_pud_safe(pudp, pud) \
>>> +({ \
>>> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(pud_present(*pudp) && !pud_same(*pudp, pud)); \
>>> +    set_pud(pudp, pud); \
>>> +})
>>> +
>>> +#define set_p4d_safe(p4dp, p4d) \
>>> +({ \
>>> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(p4d_present(*p4dp) && !p4d_same(*p4dp, p4d)); \
>>> +    set_p4d(p4dp, p4d); \
>>> +})
>>> +
>>> +#define set_pgd_safe(pgdp, pgd) \
>>> +({ \
>>> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(pgd_present(*pgdp) && !pgd_same(*pgdp, pgd)); \
>>> +    set_pgd(pgdp, pgd); \
>>> +})
>>>   #endif    /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>
>> I'm wondering if we can completely get rid of these, for example via:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
>> index d8dbeac8b206..bc71c25930bb 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
>> @@ -79,10 +79,8 @@ DEFINE_POPULATE(pmd_populate_kernel, pmd, pte, init)
>>  static inline void set_##type1##_init(type1##_t *arg1,         \
>>                         type2##_t arg2, bool init)              \
>>  {                                                              \
>> -       if (init)                                               \
>> -               set_##type1##_safe(arg1, arg2);                 \
>> -       else                                                    \
>> -               set_##type1(arg1, arg2);                        \
>> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(init && ##type1##_present(*arg1) && !##type1##_same(*arg1, arg2)); \
>> +       set_##type1(arg1, arg2);                                \
>>  }
>>  
>>
>> We might be able to handle the pgd_populate etc part similarly, possibly getting
>> rid of the pgd_populate_safe etc as well.
>>
>> Assuming I don't miss anything important :)
> 
> Sounds feasible but will just leave that upto the x86 platform folks to
> change later on, after this patch which just moves these helpers inside
> the platform code.
> 
>>
>> Ideally, we get rid of the macros here and just use inline functions ...
>>
> 
> Sure, makes sense. Will change these as inline functions.
> 
> -#define set_pte_safe(ptep, pte) \
> -({ \
> -       WARN_ON_ONCE(pte_present(*ptep) && !pte_same(*ptep, pte)); \
> -       set_pte(ptep, pte); \
> -})
> +static inline void set_pte_safe(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
> +{
> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(pte_present(*ptep) && !pte_same(*ptep, pte));
> +       set_pte(ptep, pte);
> +}
> 

This has hit a road block in converting these macros as static inline
functions as suggested earlier, because pmd/pud/p4d/pgd_same() macros
are defined in generic header include/linux/pgtable.h, but way after
<asm/pgtable.h> gets included. I guess then the current patch should
be left as it is.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux