Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add hazard pointers to kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 Sept 2024 at 00:44, Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> While we were working on this problem, this refcount scalability issue got
> resolved  recently with conditional ref acquisition [3] (however, there are new
> developments in apparmor code which might bring back the refcount problem [4]).

Honestly, the various security layers should be a whole lot more
careful about their horrid performance issues, and I think that [4]
you point at needs to just be headed off at the pass.

No  more "the security layer is so bad at performance that we have to
introduce new ref mechanisms", please. Let's push back on bad security
layer code instead.

                Linus




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux