On 9/12/24 08:54, Zhu Jun wrote:
Replace malloc with calloc and add null pointer check
in case of allocation failure.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/mm/page_owner_sort.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/mm/page_owner_sort.c b/tools/mm/page_owner_sort.c
index e1f264444342..8c78265cef67 100644
--- a/tools/mm/page_owner_sort.c
+++ b/tools/mm/page_owner_sort.c
@@ -368,9 +368,10 @@ static __u64 get_ts_nsec(char *buf)
static char *get_comm(char *buf)
{
- char *comm_str = malloc(TASK_COMM_LEN);
+ char *comm_str = calloc(TASK_COMM_LEN, sizeof(char));
- memset(comm_str, 0, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+ if (!comm_str)
+ return NULL;
search_pattern(&comm_pattern, comm_str, buf);
errno = 0;
Hello Zhu,
It is pointless to resend if you haven't addressed the queries
raised by Andrew. He notes that the callers aren't handling a
possible NULL return, so there is no point in even checking for
a mem alloc failure. I haven't wandered in tools/mm but from a
programming PoV what Andrew says is correct...if you are returning
NULL then you also must decide what to do with that in the caller,
and so on, on which I cannot comment :)